|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Sept 22, 2023 5:18:02 GMT -5
Thu, Sep 21, 2023:
James Roguski has just sent an e-mail to Dame Barbara Stocking and communicated her e-mail address, and he recommends that freedom movement activists contact her. That is an encouraging move but it should be supplemented by involving protagonists with greater potential to increase uncertainty in the WEF/WHO camp.
I judge that this would include the NZ Loyal party, given that Liz Gunn and her supporters appear in some sense loyal to the entity that made Dame Barbara Stocking a "Dame", or at least loyal to what that entity is supposed to stand for. Why else choose such a name?
NZ Loyal is evidently part of the Truth, Courage, Trust and Freedom movement. That is my judgement based on watching some of Liz Gunn's videos and reading the party's principles: nzloyal.org.nz/pages/policy-overview
Here is James Roguski's e-mail to Dame Barbara Stocking:
Dear Dame Barbara Stocking,
Your guest essay in the Geneva Health Files raised a number of interesting points. However, I encourage you to read the following articles in order to develop a deeper understanding of the situation regarding the WHO CA+.
doortofreedom.org/2023/09/03/the-whos-proposed-treaty-will-increase-man-made-pandemics/
ThePeoplesDeclaration.com
Please read the article below for greater clarity regarding the United Nations "Political Declaration."
brownstone.org/articles/the-uns-new-political-declaration-on-pandemics/
I also encourage you to review the attached PDF. I believe that it will provide you with greater clarity regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations. (the PDF is not attached. W.H.)
However, you must be aware that at the very root of the problem is the obvious fact that the team that is leading the effort is simply "not fit for purpose."
media.un.org/en/asset/k1c/k1c0j8hg39
Sincerely,
etc.
W.H. continues:
Why has Dame Barbara Stocking begun to differentiate herself from the WEF/WHO mainstream?
Let us begin by examining "who she is":
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Stocking
And what has happened to her:
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9135255/Dame-Barbara-Stocking-replaced-Cambridge-college-president-year-Oxfam-scandal.html
Despite mobilization of a mob, it seems that she has managed to keep some of her support base.
Let her assimilate James Roguski's recommendations, and heed what freedom movement members write to her in response to Mr. Roguski's relevant proposal.
But let us also look into the institutional aspects of the political influence that she has until now been able to have at her disposal.
Some of us in the Activist Group of the World Freedom Alliance have explored this issue a little bit with Canadian freedom activist Dan Oke:
halva.proboards.com/thread/726/dan-oke
I contributed this to the discussion:
halva.proboards.com/post/1997
halva.proboards.com/post/2272
Three election candidates of NZ Loyal have responded to my e-mails. I really recommend the opening of communication between James Roguski and Liz Gunn, and indeed Monica Smit, who is with us in Greece at this moment.
Very best wishes,
Wayne Hall
Aegina, Greece
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Sept 22, 2023 5:33:04 GMT -5
WELL SAID
A number of people have shared with me the emails that they sent to Dame Barbara Stocking. I appreciate their skillful writing and I applaud their efforts. Please read their emails below.
James Roguski
Sep 22
If you have not yet shared your advice with Dame Barbara Stocking, please do so.
Contact Dame Barbara Mary Stocking: bms44@cam.ac.uk
Below are wonderful emails that others have already sent.
Hello Barbara,
We're both women of roughly the same age, different paths but various life challenges and accomplishments to make us elders in our time.
RE: your recent guest essay, we do need integrity and independence, starting with the question “cui bono?” Essentially, who benefits? And at whose expense?
Influenza has been around as long as humanity; it's a process by which the body eliminates metabolic wastes, toxins, debris it knows it should get rid of, not retain in the body. When people take measures to interfere with that process, the (crud) remains in the body, encumbering normal physiological processes, adding to the clutter, gradually leading to greater likelihood of more complex diseases. Such diseases are not merely infectious and usually brief, but if impeded become chronic and degenerative, often leading to cancer. To have a Global Public Health Convention making decisions for the entire world, under the guise of 'equity' and to ensure that research and innovation continue(s) in the pharmaceutical industries', is flat out dangerous.
You and I both know that a major donor to the WHO makes enormous amounts of $ through vaccines, and that his poorly disguised intent is more to profit and increase his already ungodly billions than to promote health, and if people don't get disease along the way, that's coincidence. This is not about health; it's about business. Meanwhile the fruits of the current WHO (and allies) latest decree of a global pandemic have resulted in millions dead, paralyzed, severely encumbered not from the disease itself but from the measures to deal with it, specifically the experimental shots -- called vaccines only to grant them absolute lack of liability when people are injured by them (See OpenVAERS.com in case you're not already aware of the damage they've done), or by the medications approved (remdesivir = run death is near), or by delay of proper treatment and denial of time tested measures which have clearly been shown effective but whose use interferes with 'emergency use authorization' claims.
Major disruption to economies and basic social structures
Cui bono?
To grant one agency the power to declare a pandemic, to declare treatment -- and to deny other measures -- is at best out of touch with solid understanding of human nature. (Spoiler alert: People tend to put personal interest over what's good for others.)
Make sure that people all over the world have access to clean water, to locally grown food -- that's food, not commodity substances, and to self determination. When your goldfish keep getting sick and die, do you clean their tank, or vaccinate the fish? Drugs are not the answer to health; you can't poison your way to 'health' by continually disabling the body's efforts to heal itself = blocking symptoms.
Please disconnect your gracious self (and any shadow selves as well) from this dishonest scheme. State your respectable and informed word AGAINST any single agency making declarations that apply to everyone on the entire planet, and NO to any effort that seeks to put pharmaceutical businesses in charge. (IOW Don't let them USE you.) Granted it's a fabulous business plan -- declare a pandemic anytime Pharma comes up with a new drug (or market share falters), (call it a vaccine to eliminate liability), impose one solution/medication on everyone, silence all dissenters, and rake in the profits. Unfortunately, my sense of integrity is such that I'd have a hard time sleeping at night if I were part of such a scheme.
Please, honored gracious senior woman and fellow human traveler, look at the entire picture and ask what's really going on. Cui bono? What do you want your legacy to really be?
Very truly yours, and if you are ever in the Toledo Ohio USA area, my door is always open for you to drop in, and have a proper cup of tea.
Sincerely,
Karen L.
Dear Dame Barbara Stocking,
I hope this letter finds you well. Your guest essay in the Geneva Health Files was both insightful and thought-provoking. However, after reading it, some additional perspectives warrant your attention to facilitate a deeper understanding of the issues related to the World Health Organization's CA+ framework.
The current trajectory of WHO CA+ focuses extensively on bolstering the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex (PHEIC), rather than addressing global citizens' core health and human rights. I would like to emphasize that these negotiations need to be re-evaluated and potentially halted until we resolve many pressing issues.
To offer a more structured approach, I recommend focusing on the following areas before moving forward with any negotiations:
Origins of SARS-CoV-2: Understand its origins to learn the lessons it offers for prevention.
COVID-19 Transmissibility and Risk: Scientifically review the data on its transmissibility and real level of danger.
Social Controls: Evaluate the long-term efficacy and collateral damage caused by implemented social controls such as lockdowns and mask mandates.
Medical Countermeasures: Assess vaccines' efficacy and long-term safety, particularly mRNA-based solutions, and other medical interventions.
Alternative Measures: Investigate why less invasive or costly measures were largely suppressed or disregarded.
Conflicts of Interest: Examine the role of private profits and other interests that may have influenced public health policies.
Accountability: Investigate the actions and decisions by WHO and other international bodies, especially in the context of their diplomatic immunity.
Please consider these multidimensional aspects in your ongoing discussions about the WHO's approach to global health governance. At its core, the current leadership seems "unfit for purpose.” A comprehensive review is imperative.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your thoughts on these matters.
Sincerely,
Stewart
Dear Dame Barbara Stocking
Bigger has never proved better, as it is usually too unwieldy. To give to one costly, non-representative world body the power to decide what constitutes a pandemic, the power to decide if there is the possibility of a pandemic; to give such an organisation, funded as it partly is by entities such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, one of whose founders is heavily invested in profiting from pharmaceutical products, who has a terrible reputation for damaging the health of children in India and Africa, the power to decide and not 'advise', but make it mandatory for poorly tested mRNA so called vaccines which are actually not vaccines but gene therapies, to be foisted upon the peoples of all countries who fund the WHO, is a really poorly thought through idea.
All it requires is the simple 'capture' by nefarious means (not unheard of), of the HEAD of that organisation by any corrupt individuals or company, and the whole world would be at the mercy of criminals. Corporations such as many in the pharmaceutical fields have had to pay massive fines for the damage they have done to people with some of their drugs...take Pfizer as an example. Let us not hand a Carte Blanche to potential miscreants.
If we wish to avoid pandemics each country needs to see to it that their population is healthy and it is up to the People of each country to decide how to approach their government about this matter. A top down, heavy handed approach by an unelected entity such as the WHO, agreed to by unelected representatives from different countries, with absolutely no real public debate having been held about such an important issue as ones personal health, is both insane and undemocratic.
I strongly recommend that you change your mind about promoting this Pandemic Treaty and the terrible amendments to the IHR that have removed the words 'Human Dignity', amongst other changes, which bode no good to humanity, for the sake of the well being of said humanity.
In hope I thank you.
Regards,
SuziAlkamyst
Dear Dame Barbara Stocking,
In response to your guest essay on Geneva Health Files, I offer my opinion on world health initiatives.
Persuasion is better than force. Each locality should be offered information from diverse sources, and free to respond in a way democratically selected, and responsive to local needs. For example, UK chose to respond to the COVID pandemic by closing down businesses and encouraging vaccination. That worked for UK, and limited deaths to 330 per 100K population. Nigeria chose to use ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for prevention and early treatment, and limited deaths to 1 death per 100K population.
Different solutions for different localities.
Josh Mitteldorf
Madam,
I trust you are well, given events.
I am writing to you to express my dismay at the role of the British establishment in current affairs, notably at the United Nations. As a child I remember my grandfather returning from New York and a visit to the U.N. and explaining the Charter and the hopes of nations emergent from the tragedy of global war. That his memento of the visit was an ashtray, that to this day I retain, seems somewhat apt considering the depths to which the once august institution has fallen.
The evident funding by Western oligarchy, assent by royalty and diktat by supranational organisations, who can all be described as neo-Malthusian, cares not one jot about health, wellbeing and peace but only control. These post-modern, technocratic zealots have taken the wrong path, an unnatural path, and I would urge you to call them out as others are doing. This precious jewel of a planet which we inhabit will provide for all, it just takes effort. The complicated, difficult and righteous path is not one the idle rich have ever traversed. Perhaps it is time for them to do so.
Regards,
LaMaisonGelat
Good morning from Texas!
I'm curious, why do you think countries cannot handle their own policies in dealing with pandemics? Isn't it demeaning to assume a committee of outsiders know better? People with common sense understand that a committee is not the answer, just a waste of money and a concentration of power in the hands of those that believe they know best. The world and society will thrive when individuals have autonomy.
Thank you for taking the time to consider that you might be on the wrong track and I hope we can count on you to support the fundamental right of humans to determine their own destiny.
Gina T.
Dear Dame Stocking:
I respond to your public request for advice concerning the ongoing negotiations about the WHO CA+ and IHR amendment negotiations, which you described as "in a difficult place".
My advice is to put your hands in the air and step away from those negotiations.
Take notice: You are engaged in an attempt to subvert the sovereignty of nations around the world, notably my own, the United States of America. This marks you as an enemy of the Constitution of the United States. You have been identified and your actions documented.
The WHO CA+ and IHR amendment negotiations are a transparent attempt by the WHO to grant itself supra sovereign powers using medical emergencies as a pretext. The 10th amendment of the US Constitution reserve health policy decisions to the States or to The People. Even our Congress does not have the legitimate authority to give those powers over to the WHO. Hands off!
Clearly the WHO is acting as a catspaw of the globalist elite publicly spearheaded by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, The Chinese Communist Party, George Soros - all eugenicists, all promoters of One World Government unaccountable to We The People, all sociopaths hostile to humanity.
I insist that "government of the People by The People for The People shall not perish from the Earth." I will not consent. I will not comply. We will resist.
I ask that you reconsider your position in this global coup attempt.
Please cease your attempts to breach the sovereignty of the U.S. Constitution.
Please read the attached critique of the proposed amendments.
Sincerely,
Erik L.
United States of America
Dear Dame Barbara Stocking
I totally support the analysis by James Roguski as shown in the attached .pdf file.
I don't have a problem with the WHO being a discussion/consulting organization, but I am totally against it assuming the power to control the sovereignty of all nations when it comes to health decisions or anything else, including the bodily autonomy of all citizens. I will not follow the dictates of any world organization.
I will not comply!
Brenda R.
Dear Dame Barbara Stocking,
I think it is beyond dispute that the World Health Organization has been, at best, woefully incompetent, or, at worst, positively harmful to the people of the world.
We can cut through this Gordian knot of amendments and negotiations by encouraging all countries
to withdraw from the WHO,
to defund the WHO, and
to repeal any legislation that was used to create the WHO.
This might offend the banksters at the BIS, the Bank of England, and the U.S. Federal Reserve, but the rest of humanity will sleep more soundly knowing that a global criminal gang has been put down.
Best regards,
Dan M.
Respected Dame Barbara Stocking,
Regarding the WHO and the secret negotiations they are doing:
In the past 4 years the WHO has lost all remaining credibility about caring for the health of the inhabitants of this planet, and became more and more clear for us the people, that it is not about health, but about greed of power and control, conspiring with private (and ignorant in health issues) billionaires and corporations in a deathly lobbying agenda. And after this course of action, nobody seems to be accountable for their inefficacy, for their prerogatives to create a "pandemic" that never was, deploy a lethal injection (bioweapon) in billions of people who were unaware of the risks and consequences of their "trust in the science and recommendations of the WHO and their health professionals." Crimes were committed.
There is no moral authority for the WHO and their bodies to do anything, and why would sovereign nations and their inhabitants render it to a bunch of conspirators?
It is difficult after what we lived in the last time, to dialogue with liars and criminals who not only are trying to avoid responsibilities, but to have more power to do more atrocities.
Until justice is delivered, it would not be prudent for any self respecting citizen to dialogue with "health terrorists".
In attachment a very detailed document that represent a lot of my concerns.
Thanks for your attention, receive you my kindest regards,
Carlé C.
Thank you for soliciting advice from people on the impasse at the WHO CA+. I would like to tell you how I and many others think about the plan the WHO/WEF/UN and other world wide PPP criminal syndicates have decided for we the people. We don't want it implemented. Why?
The WHO would like unprecedented powers of control over our lives. Such control is not in their charter and is thus illegal. More importantly, the WHO has shown that it is a complete failure as an organization which actually improves people's health.
During COVID-19 it behaved in a criminal manner, restricting the freedom of the people, giving commands for treatments which were deadly while forbidding treatments which were effective and actually safe. The WHO forbid discussion of the origin of COVID-19. The only treatments it pushed were those which resulted in death and maiming--so called "vaccines". The WHO used this time period to grab economic power over nation states and individuals. It took power over individual rights such as travel and even getting groceries if one did not have a vax pass. This pass was not about health, after all, vaccines do not prevent transmission, infection, and one is more likely to spread COVID-19, to be hospitalized and die if one has had the injection. Injections are not about health, they are about control. There is no legal or ethical right held by the WHO, it is simply grabbing this power on behalf of its masters.
The WHO wishes to illegally be an instrument of control over nation states and all the world's people. I guess that is very equitable? But I tell you, we will be equally free, not equally controlled.
I don't care what measures you try to get through the WHO, we the people will not comply. We are free. We are not "inclusive", "equitable" slaves to this and other PPP/world wide corrupt, criminal syndicates. You misunderstand: we are not your slaves and we know exactly what you are trying to do to us. We will control our own banking, speech, health care, movement and economies
Jill
Dear Dame Barbara,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the WHO negotiations.
The reason why they are not progressing well for you is because the WHO is a morally bankrupt criminal control organisation and the people are not going to put up with their bodies and farms being controlled by 'one source of information.'
This is called censorship.
This censorship killed tens of millions during covid in the form of shutting down and starving the third world, withholding early treatment, vaccines that were not safe or effective and hospital protocols that saw people strapped down and murdered while their families screamed on the other side of tempered glass while their families were crash tackled by police.
I saw my fellow Australians get shot in the street and I was told I should be liquidated in a camp for being unvaccinated and my country build multiple large camps called 'wellness centres' for the purposes of separating families and destroying lives chasing the unicorn farm of 'covid zero.' All on the order of the WHO 'declaring a pandemic' for something that was no more deadly than influenza.
Australia had a federal COVID-19 plan in February 2020 that was ripped up on your orders because you blackmailed us and we bent over and took it because our leaders are feckless compromised cowards.
People like you killed tens of millions and if you do not cease and desist you will kill tens of millions more.
You have zero authority to operate in Australia, the people of Australia do not recognise your authority and we will not and never will comply with you and your orders.
You, the WHO and your pandemic treaty can go to hell. This is God's country, not yours.
Best wishes and kind regards!
ExcessDeathsAU
|
|
