Post by Wayne Hall on Jul 4, 2023 7:21:50 GMT -5
Richard Vobes and King Charles III
Richard Vobes raises the possibility that King Charles III could be open to charges of treason owing to his involvement with the Climate Clock political campaign.
For Children's Health Defense or World Freedom Alliance (or indeed Informed Consent Action Network) activists it is perhaps not irrelevant that Robert Kennedy Jr. has different views on climate to those of Richard Vobes: www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-the-climate-crisis-what-must-be-done-192191/ But Richard Vobes' question about the legitimacy of King Charles' public identification with the Climate Clock campaign does not depend on anybody's views on climate, including those of King Charles.
Involvement in partisan political campaigning contravenes the deontology of constitutional monarchy (and indeed the deontology of a non-executive presidency.)
Should a common public position be adopted by our movements?
Richard Vobes raises the possibility that King Charles III could be open to charges of treason owing to his involvement with the Climate Clock political campaign.
For Children's Health Defense or World Freedom Alliance (or indeed Informed Consent Action Network) activists it is perhaps not irrelevant that Robert Kennedy Jr. has different views on climate to those of Richard Vobes: www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-the-climate-crisis-what-must-be-done-192191/ But Richard Vobes' question about the legitimacy of King Charles' public identification with the Climate Clock campaign does not depend on anybody's views on climate, including those of King Charles.
Involvement in partisan political campaigning contravenes the deontology of constitutional monarchy (and indeed the deontology of a non-executive presidency.)
Should a common public position be adopted by our movements?