|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Nov 16, 2022 5:39:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Nov 16, 2022 5:42:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 1, 2022 7:44:01 GMT -5
In the case of the so-called "vaccinations", not only do they not protect but they sometimes literally kill, immediately or gradually. They have killed babies in the womb. They have caused infertility in women and sterility in men. Given that it has become fashionable to institute international days for one thing and another, perhaps it would be good to propose an International Truth Day to promote recognition of this particular truth also. But which date would be appropriate? A suitable day in my opinion would be 26th January - it is the day when the first governor of modern Greece, Ioannis Capodistrias, was sworn in, in 1828. It is also the day when in 1788 a prison and a prison colony was established in Sydney in Australia. In both cases this official day does not enjoy unanimous support. Capodistrias in Greece, like the similarly assassinated John Kennedy in the U.S.A. is seen as a divisive figure. Likewise the establishment of a prison in Sydney is regarded by some as not a good choice of date for a national celebration. But it is the day when Western civilization came to Australia. It is Australia's national day and it is vehemently defended by Australian politicians such as the senator of Serbian extraction Alex Antic, who is a fellow member of the freedom movement and a social ally.
W. Hall, Aegina
I bet you’ve already noticed the uptick in the use of terms like “myocarditis”, “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome”, or the phrase “died suddenly” over the past year. Medical conditions and causes of death like these were previously rare, largely unheard of and unused in common parlance. But in the last two years, that’s all changed. These are not easy issues to talk about, and many would prefer to simply look the other way or to “leave the past in the past”. I can understand why people don’t want to address or acknowledge it. It’s a hard truth – a difficult pill to swallow, so to speak. But we must face these problems head on, and the first step is to acknowledge that something has changed – that something is not quite right. I recently submitted a Freedom of Information request to the South Australian Department for Health to view the trends in cardiac presentations across our state’s hospitals. When the data came back, it revealed that for 15-44 year olds, cardiac presentations to all public hospitals in the state were steady at just over 1,000 per month, month on month since January 2018. But right on cue, just as the vaccine mandates rolled out in South Australia, that number doubled from July to November 2021, spiking at approximately 2100 per month. If there are 2,100 cardiac presentations a month, that’s baseline average. If ever there was a smoking gun, this is it. Ιt would be easy to look the other way but you and I know we can't do that. We can't do that when health authorities across the country continue to push the injection narrative. The COVID injection campaign and unjust mandates will go down as the greatest medical scandal in history. It's something previously unthinkable for a freedom loving country like Australia, but the truth won't be ignored. It's a truth that you and Ι have known all along, one we've told anyone who will listen, feeling often like we're screaming at a brick wall. The truth is that the "experts" got it wrong. Worse, when they knew it was wrong, they continued to push their narrative. It's not too late to save ourselves from a medical technocratic tyranny, which marches on in lock-step with the likes of the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum, to limit your freedom and force you to submit to unelected global control of every aspect of your life. By continuing to fight, by continuing to push back against the overreach of 'progressive' bureaucracies, we can take back our independence. We can seize this opportunity to change the trajectory of this great country and put us back on the path of freedom and individual liberty that our forbears fought so hard for.
Yours sincerely,
Alex Antic, Liberal Senator for South Australia
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 23, 2022 23:36:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 31, 2022 11:55:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Jan 15, 2023 3:31:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Feb 3, 2023 5:52:24 GMT -5
From Senator Alex Antic
Margaret Thatcher once said that:
“Communism never sleeps, never changes its objectives.
Nor must we.”
While the rhetoric has changed, the objectives of communism remain the same: the abolition of private property and total control afforded to the State.
In the famous opening words of The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx wrote, “A spectre is haunting Europe – the spectre of communism.” It was a fitting choice of words given the misery and destruction that has ensued everywhere that pure communism has been implemented.
Yet, believers in Marx’s utopian fantasy continue to populate our government departments, including our education system, universities, and the media. As the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci said in 1915: “Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity. … In the new order, Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society.”
Marx claimed to be concerned for the rights of the working class (although he barely worked a day in his life) and was right in saying that powerful, wealthy people can and do exploit weaker people.
But the solution is not abolishing the right to property but upholding it. Not giving total control to the State but minimising it.
Marx desired even to abolish the family and the concept of the nation, institutions upon which he knew the “old social order” of Christian Europe was maintained.
To quote Marx:
Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain.”
So, what are the examples of the supposed communist utopias Marx envisioned? What happens when private property is abolished, and all power is granted to the State? You get Lenin and Stalin’s Russia, Mao’s China, Castro’s Cuba, the Kim dynasty’s North Korea, and Pol Pot’s Cambodia – all violent, tyrannical regimes that produced suffering and death on an unimaginable scale.
In our day, the “old social order” is increasingly under attack.
The nuclear family is under attack. Children are indoctrinated at school, where they are separated from their parents, into social-justice ideology, as well as a general dependence on the State, complete with Critical Race Theory, the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion agenda, and climate alarmism.
Taxes and the cost of living are needlessly high, and the State’s monopoly over finance and how you spend your money is expanding. Progressive activists, backed by the State, use identity-politics to foster grievance between so-called identity groups. It is no longer just about the proletariat and the bourgeoises, but about one’s race, gender, sexuality, and so on. That’s why the government promotes the “Voice to Parliament” and so-called “Gender Conversion Therapy” laws – it fosters division and gets on-side those who are “protected” by the State, making them dependents.
The government says, “More power to the government.” Climate change requires we ban fossil fuels in pursuit of Net Zero. COVID requires you to let the government control your medical decisions and restrict your movements. Racism and sexism require employee quotas and mandatory diversity workshops.
We must resist the welfare state, which globalist entities like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations endlessly promote.
We must ardently oppose what Marx argued for; we must protect the nuclear family and our national heritage.
Communism continues to haunt us, but if we understand it, we can defeat it.
Your sincerely,
Alex Antic
Liberal Senator for South Australia[/i]
Some thoughts on what Senator Antic writes:
There is more than a little truth in his analysis. Much of his criticism was addressed by the ultimately unsuccessful reform Communist movement of the 1970s. But as a Left activist from that time I can also say that the present day WOKE version of Leftist attitudes and goals is largely unrecognizable to me as an authentic continuation of the what was then the Leftist problematic. This is a factor ostentatiously ignored by a considerable proportion of present-day conservative activists and spokespersons, who continue more or less singing the same song as they were singing during the first Cold War. They are attacking a Leftism and a Communism that is largely their own creation. The Greek alternative politician Phaedon Vovolis, himself of what would once have been called Centre Right persuasion, has encapsulated the reality nicely: "Whoever you are not afraid of you promote. Through your television stations, through your gallup polls. and so on. But those you are afraid of you exclude and you copy."
You exclude them and you copy them. This seems accurate to me: to what extent are today's Leftists, today's "Communists", the product of right-wing "copying". To a very large extent, I tend to believe. Factor this into the equation, and know thyself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Feb 3, 2023 22:54:36 GMT -5
"Left-Wing Communism, An Infantile Disorder
www.marx2mao.com › Lenin › LWC20
The surest way of discrediting and damaging a new political (and not only political) idea is to reduce it to absurdity on the plea of defending it.
|
|
