|
|
Israel
Oct 12, 2021 23:33:47 GMT -5
Post by Wayne Hall on Oct 12, 2021 23:33:47 GMT -5
Vaccination testimonies
|
|
|
|
Israel
Oct 20, 2021 21:16:33 GMT -5
Post by Wayne Hall on Oct 20, 2021 21:16:33 GMT -5
Ilana Rachel Daniel
|
|
|
|
Israel
May 26, 2022 10:42:33 GMT -5
Post by Wayne Hall on May 26, 2022 10:42:33 GMT -5
The Jerusalem Report
live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/the-jerusalem-report/-VayV8WuW4
With Ilana Rachel Daniel
Welcome back to the Jerusalem Report. I'm Ilana Rachel Daniel. For today there is only one thing we should be focused on. And that is the proposal for a pandemic treaty that sits on the plate of the WHO, one they seek to dish out to 194 member states, those who represent 99% of the world population. This treaty, stated plainly, allows the Director-General of the WHO to dictate to your sovereign nation precisely how they must respond to the inevitable pandemic they constantly threaten us with. As the latest nauseating rumours of the newest viruses make the rounds it's a truly sickening display of psychological warfare, with no forecast of easing in sight. This, in fact, is the final swooping in to take the whole of the old reigning order. Our best ambitions of democracy, which they have worked around the clock to destroy these past two years, at least.
On November 29th 2021 the WHO's health assembly convened in a special session, only the second ever since its inception in 1948. Over the course of that four-day meeting, the WHO agreed to "launch the process to develop a historic global accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response."
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director-General, said that the decision was "historic", "vital", and represented a "once in a generation opportunity" to "strengthen the global health architecture to protect and promote the well-being of all people". He further said "the COVID19 pandemic has shone a light on the many flaws in the global system to protect people from pandemics. The most vulnerable people going without vaccines. Health workers without needed equipment to perform their life-saving work." And "me first approaches that stymie the global solidarity needed to deal with our global threat." And on March 3rd 2022 the European Council of the EU gave the green light to start negotiations on an international pandemic treaty.
"Critical Sway", an investigator, formerly for the government, now for the people, did an overview of that treaty. Doing just a quick search, he found the word
"vaccine" or "vaccination" appeared 33 times. "Surveillance" 30 times. "Misinformation" seven and "privacy" five times. Of 131 proposals, the following are some choice pieces of what this Constitution entails as it seeks to consolidate WHO power as the directing and co-ordinating authority on international health. Responsibility is assigned in three parts: to member states, the WHO, or other "stakeholders". It includes - you'll be shocked - more funding for the WHO, regular simulation exercises, and help by those stakeholders to combat disinformation and use their "considerable data" to assist the WHO. It includes more research "to inform and expand public health and social measures during pandemics" and increased support for the WHO research and development blueprint. The WHO obviously will act as the directing and co-ordinating authority on international health. What it promises is depoliticized recruitment, a focus on merit and competency. Member states will give the WHO more money. More investments will be made to support the development of vaccines and therapeutics. Temporary initiatives that were developed as a response to COVID19 can now be made permanent as well as an expansion of their focus. It will see the implementation of a one-health-approach to reduce risk of zoonotic diseases,that is: the transmission of disease from animals to humans; more genomic testing, the development of plans for emergency surveillance and response, the development of national focal points, with an authority in each country and a WHO guide of best practices and regular training for those focal points, travel and trade regulations, the increased sharing of public health data with info within the WHO, proactive measures against misinformation and social media attacks, stronger information management, development of a digital certificate of vaccination and of a digital contact tracing in an international context. And of course increased vaccine development, manufacturing capacity and regulation. And initiatives to ensure those with limited means receive them. That's just to name a few.
So from where does the WHO get the critical funding needed to enact such ambitious schemes? They do from two main sources: one is member states pay a percentage of their nation's gross domestic product as decided by the UN. That covers less than 20% of the WHO budget. The rest, that is the remaining 80%, is covered by voluntary contributions from member states and other partners. The WHO's budget is around seven and a half billion US dollars. About ten percent of those funds comes from - I hope you're sitting down - the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Another six percent comes from GAVI Alliance, which is also Bill Gates, rounding him out at some sixteen percent of funding to the WHO, at least, rivalled only by Germany, who overtook the US as the biggest contributor, at seventeen percent. The Gates Foundation, much like having an arms dealer at the UN Security Council, has been a key donor to the WHO over the past decade, accounting for as much as thirty percent of the group's budget for just the 2016 to 2017 period. Only 55 percent of WHO funding comes from member states. The rest comes from foundations, banks, partnership, i.e. pharma and big tech, UN organizations and more. For a fun example of the revolving-door theatre that is our world regulators, the top funders for the pandemic influenza preparedness program weres none other than influenza vaccine manufacturer SANOFI at sixteen million and GlaxoSmithKline at ten million dollars. Now Israel, who intends to sign this treaty, published in 2020 that they also signed for the first time ever a Country Cooperation Strategy with the UN for years 2019 to 2025. The purpose is "the development of priorities for public health action to support the adoption of e-health and big data and health care systems." The plan elaborates its intention to advance emergency preparedness and response and strengthen the role of Israel in global health by increasing collaboration between the WHO and Israeli scientific institutions across sectors with all the collaboration and exchange of ideas and approaches. The agreement goes on to say "digital health is a national priority in Israel as part of the country's research and development strategy." Collated data is broken down between socio-economic groups to enable policy-making by evidence. Big data analysis, telemedicine tools, genomics and personalized medicine and health service management, computerized patient records are part of operational testing and implementation and integration. The Ministry of Health co-ordinates big data projects to streamline the use of tech in population health, with the goal of integrating big data solutions in Israeli health care. The Etonne project plans to combine the existing OFEK platform that collects data from HMO organizations already for twenty years and put it all together on one platform and access it to care givers. And Project TIMNA will promote data collection, storage and analysis of it all. Twenty of our world leaders, including Boris Johnson, Emmanuel Macron. Joe Biden and Australian PM Scott Morrison are rallying hard for this treaty, comparing our post-COVID world to post World War II. I guess we're allowed to make comparisons after all. They have stated we have a need now to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism" and to "address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation", namely "peace, prosperity, health and security". The Biden administration thinks this plan is so splendid that it submitted amendments to the treaty to give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by that country, amendments which may be binding under international law. This greatest seizing of power in the history of humankind is set to move forward when they convene at the World Health Assembly in just a few days, from May 22nd to the 28th to vote on Provision 16.2, which involves the member-state sharing of information with the WHO at the onset of outbreak in that country, and the WHO's authority to alert other countries if they deem it necessary.
Why would any nation voluntarily give up its sovereignty? What might possess 194 countries to allow the centralization of power in a single body? Perhaps even in a single individual! Tedros, the current Director-General, neither hallowed doctor nor scientist, has open ties and accusations of terrorist activity in his homeland Ethiopia. As Minister of Health there he was accused of systematic discrimination and human rights abuses by refusing health care to the Amharic ethnic groups for their affiliation with the opposition party. In 2017 he was accused of covering up a cholera epidemic in Ethiopia though it raged in bordering Somalia. Tedros received the ire of US doctors who wrote: "Your silence about what is clearly a massive cholera epidemic in Sudan daily becomes reprehensible."
So this is an example of who will rule us? These bodies funded and run by career figureheads who haven't laid a single hand on an actual patient the entire pandemic? Those who have already declared their mission to see at least seventy percent of the world injected? Even proponents of COVID narrative injectibles have voiced their concern. The ICJ. the International Commission of Jurists. called for the pandemic treaty to be grounded in human rights and submitted to them ten principles they asked to be adopted. They also requested the participation of civil society organizations to be involved in the drafting lest without their input "we lose the lessons of those who fought for human rights and the rule of law throughout the COVID19 pandemic." Human Rights Watch too was quoted as warning that the proposed treaty "not be undermined by the same abuses of power and monopolization and further marginalization of the already disenfranchised that marked the past two years of pandemic policy."
On May 4th in the UK a petition was launched demanding a national referendum before the UK agrees to the WHO treaty. The petition already has 120,000 signatures and will run on their site until November 3rd, where all UK citizens are invited to sign. Few have been more vocal in shaking us from our stupor than German MEP Christine Anderson. Here she is now: "Well, my name is Christine Anderson. I'm an elected representative for the German people in the EU Parliament and I try to serve their best interests. If you give executive powers to a non-elected body, then you no longer have democracy. You no longer have accountability of elected officials, and who will the citizens hold accountable for having taken away their rights? Who will be held responsible for this? In theory, and I have to say in theory, elected representatives run the risk of not being elected again if they screw up. But with a non-elected body the citizens have no recourse any more whatsoever. And this is not how democracy is supposed to work because you are taking away the rule by the people for the people. That's what you take away with it. And people need to understand: if this treaty goes through you can bury democracy altogether. It's done with. They have the right to call out a pandemic and once they do they will seize executive powers of the member states. So it's not now the government, let's say the German government in our instance, that will impose restrictions on us, that we could theoretically fight - even now it's hard enough to do - but how are you going to go against WHO? You can't drag them to court. You can't threaten them to not elect them any more. They don't care. I mean, they're funded by the richest of the super-rich people in the world. They don't care. They have all the money, and they don't care about fundamental rights and democracy. If they say: "You will stay at home for as long as I tell you", you will.
There is always hope. And there are quite a few things you can do. It's not easy, but for one: get involved, take an interest in what's actually happening, because that's part of their game. They've removed the decision-making so far away from you, they're counting on you to no longer care, so they can do whatever the hell they want, without you ever knowing it. So get involved, you know, stay on top. And I know this is hard because they're doing everything to make it as hard as possible. I mean a lot of people nowadays work two jobs. I understand, when you're coming home, having worked two jobs, you don't want to be bothered with politics or, you know, decision-making. None of this. But you have to, because if you don't, then they will walk all over you. And that's what they're doing. There are a lot of things going on. You need to see a big picture. It's various different mechanisms. Instruments. Crises they need to find. Whatever. Integration of EU to have this superstate. But you need to see the big picture, the goal of all this. It's abolition of democracy, taking away your freedom, and it's no longer having to abide by the rule of law. That's what they're trying to do. So get involved. Now, luckily MEPs are elected. So write to your MEP and let them know what you do not want. And if they vote for this, that or the other, then tell them: "I will not vote for you any more." That gets them scared, you know. So every once in a while there is, like, a campaign, but it's usually run by the Left side, you know. So we get thousands of e-mails, you know, basically it's pretty much the same thing, urging us to vote for this or not vote for this, or whatever. But that's what people need to do. Let your MPs know what you will tolerate and what you will not tolerate. And let them know in no uncertain terms that you will not stand for anyone taking your rights away from you. Another thing you could do if you don't want to write e-mails it might actually be better to write letters to their offices, you know, pointing out an issue that you do not agree on. Talk to people. If there are other citizens around you organizing protests, join them, you know. Voice your opinion. Be there. Be in our faces. Because that's what we need in order to represent your interests. So, like I said, get involved. And for God's sake turn off your TV. Seriously, I turned off my TV a long time ago. And I will have to say, if was very beneficial to my mental health."
What's happening here is the pillage of the primary scaffolding Western nations have been built upon. What rules have our leaders been promised in this re-ordering that aims to speak in place of the people. After two years of relentless terror this treaty is a culmination of that abuse. This is where they know we, thin and brittle from our nose against screens seeking truth, seeking the elusive understanding we only ever receive of scraps. This is the too-tired-to-fight-any-more swoop of prey on the remains of our democracy. So now we get to join every sane person on the planet in chorus of resounding NO. Should it come to pass, I don't plan to be weighted with the guilt of what might have been done to prevent it. Take the minutes to sign the petitions on-line, to write your representatives, to assure them they will never hold power again if they vote to usurp ours now. And then, if you're feeling like me, step away from the debilitating glare of the screen and as this glorious summer approaches move around in the sun with the people you love.
|
|
