|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 21, 2022 7:03:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 21, 2022 7:05:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 22, 2022 4:00:34 GMT -5
Are there some who would seek to entrap King Charles along with the rest of the population? The king's duty is to embody the sovereignty of his own state, not of all states, or even of some states, if he does not have sovereignty over them. Yes, he can participate in a collective effort to become "defender of the faiths" but within that collective he defends his own faith, which is prescribed as being the Christian faith as interpreted by the Anglican church. Some Anglicans, including King Charles' late father Prince Phillip, have evidently sympathized with Orthodox Christianity, but this has been de facto. Could it constitutionally be made something else? This would seem to presuppose less change than the King of England and the other states he heads becoming "defender of the faiths".
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 22, 2022 23:27:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 23, 2022 23:17:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 23, 2022 23:18:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 24, 2022 0:01:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 24, 2022 21:52:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on Dec 25, 2022 23:16:48 GMT -5
|
|
