|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on May 3, 2020 5:23:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on May 3, 2020 5:23:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nikosvako on May 5, 2020 1:51:30 GMT -5
Wayne,I have a question, maybe I am taking it wrong but I want your opinion. Could this film, except exposing ecologists for supporting the depopulation agenda, being a part of the nuclear power agenda? I haven't watched it, it's only from your description that this doubt came to my mind. Is there, in the documentary , any proposal or is t just aiming to criticize eologists and renewables. I will watch but your opinion and your observatons are always interesting!
|
|
|
|
Post by Wayne Hall on May 5, 2020 2:57:03 GMT -5
Niko I don't think they are "exposing ecologists for supporting the depopulation agenda". They are targeting the ecological agenda for being hypocritical, making promises it cannot keep, not proposing anything that can make possible reduced dependence on fossil fuels. A central message of the new Michael Moore film that population reduction is necessary.
As for nuclear power, I don't remember them saying anything about it in this particular film.
Some conventionally right-wing climate-change-sceptic sites that are taking satisfaction from Michael Moore's shift (e.g. stopthesethings.com/2020/05/03/inconvenient-truths-msm-attempts-to-bury-mike-moores-planet-of-the-humans/)
are nuclear power enthusiasts, though.
And they are being opposed by ecologists for this reason. Ecologists whose conclusions about renewables and their potential to be competitive are the exact opposite of Michael Moore's.
www.bnnbloomberg.ca/nuclear-is-getting-hammered-by-green-power-and-the-pandemic-1.1430903
So, a great many agendas but how much objective scientific information?
|
|
