Post by Wayne Hall on Feb 14, 2016 1:45:22 GMT -5
Michael Murphy: Extracts from “Geoengineering and the climate change agenda”
Some really good questions that people demanding that the legislators do more are not asking
We’re not saying the planet’s not warming or not cooling. We’re not even arguing that. And that’s the beauty of it because what it does: it gives incentive for those who are really pushing this climate change agenda and the global warming issue. We can partner with them to say let’s move forward in stopping geoengineering, together collectively for the planet. Let’s partner. And that’s what our message is.
6.00 Many people are noticing now that forests are collapsing. I spent the summer in Chicago and they’ve had an abundance, just an abundance of rain, over the past couple of years, and I would say about twenty percent of the trees are dead. They are dying.
6.29 What we addressed in both of the two previous films: the aluminum, and that’s the primary ingredient, that they’re spraying, and other things as well which hopefully we’ll get into, they are very toxic to soils, to ecosystems and as a result the PH has been changing, sometimes in certain areas up to ten times the alkalinity. As a result of those changes due to the metals that they’re putting into our sky we’re getting these ecosystem collapses. We’re getting forests collapsing, but as we’ve spoken about in other shows there’s a company called Arbigen that’s genetically modifying forests. So the trees die. Corporate America, or should I say the genetically modified companies, are there, to “save the day”.
13.55 What geoengineering is doing, it’s creating climate change. Geoengineering programs are designed to manipulate our weather and they’re designed to change the temperature of our planet. And because of this they’re creating a huge amount of our change in climate and everything of course that we see in terms of drought, in terms of temperature fluctuations, whether it’s the Jetstream or, you know, different storms coming in, it’s being blamed on CO2. And based on what we’ve researched, and from the mouths of geoengineers, these programmes change our climate. And what we have to look at, right now global governance is being formed. We have the largest transfer of monetary and political power in the history of our planet all being determined based on climate models that are targeting CO2 as the source of our changing climate. A lot of people argue. They argue whether the planet is warming or cooling. We don’t do that. Our stance is very strong. It is literally impossible to determine what the planet is doing based on the fact that we have had geoengineering for well over forty years.
15.51 Again, we don’t argue whether the planet is warming or cooling but what we are asking people to do is come together, take a second look at this, recognize that the climate models are flawed. They are missing the biggest factor in the climate change argument, and that is geoengineering. And because of that the climate models are flawed and you cannot move forward with taxation, with removing states’ national boundaries, you cannot circumvent constitutions and state laws, and those are the things that are going on.
18.30 There are certain interests, again, that really want to see the transfer of power. But there are losers, within this. There are people that might lose their companies. There are people that are definitely damaged. And also regions, you know. Certain regions that signed on to the COP21, the recent Paris, France, climate agreement. You know, I think some of them lose. But I think their backs are against the wall, so what we’re looking to do is getting support from both sides.
19.17 Geoengineering is being sold as a way to mitigate global warming. However, global warming was determined after geoengineering programs had started. We found research, you know going back, and data that shows that these programs have been ongoing since the fifties. So when these models, the climate models, were designed, they were designed not including geoengineering programs. And we believe that’s the biggest factor in our changing climate. Most people realize, especially us here in California, that our weather has been changing, that we’re having a massive drought, but you go into the Midwest, they’re getting…
George Noory: We’re flooding. We’re flooding like crazy. My daughter lost her townhouse a month ago from floods.
Exactly. So if you go up to the Arctic – and I’ll explain what’s happening – it’s very warm up there, so yes, people are saying ”Yeah, of course, you know, there is global warming”. But if you’re on the East Coast, it’s very cold. And what they’re doing, George, and what we explained in the first film, through geoengineering they have the ability to put the aerosols, which primarily are heavy metals – looks like it could be coal fly ash, at least in some of the programs, - anyway, they put these metals into the atmosphere and through HAARP and other HAARP-like technologies, ionosphere heaters, they have the ability to heat up areas of the Pacific. So what we’ve been seeing outside of California for the past couple of years: the jet stream, which should be coming right into California, bringing in precipitation and bringing in normal weather patterns, it’s getting diverted, because it hits the bubble. When they heat that up of course it creates a bubble and the jet stream hits it and it diverts north so it brings all that warm weather and all that precipitation into the Arctic region. And it warms it, and it starts melting the ice. But of course any stream, once you block it, like a river, or a stream, it’s going to want to correct itself. And it does. And it brings all that cold weather back into the Midwest and the East Coast. And that’s why California has been getting droughted out. And that’s why the Midwest and the East Coast have had an abundance of rain, very cold summers and very cold weather. That IS the climate change that is going on. Now, my first question when I heard about this, it was “Why would somebody want to do this?” You know. It didn’t make sense to me. Until we looked at California and some of the political objectives, which appear to be – right now – being met. And some of those are related to Agenda 2130. We interviewed Rosa Koire, who has been on your show and she was a tremendous… .
George Noory: Yes, she’s very good.
Yeah, and Patrick Wood did just a wonderful job. What’s happening in California: there’s a water issue. . And because of the drought, which – no question about it – was geoengineering, Jerry Brown called for a state of emergency here in California. And what that state of emergency does, it gives him the ability through eminent domain to take property, to take land. And it also gives him the ability to allocate water from small farmers who have had water trusts, and they have water rights… What’s being done is they’re diverting water away from them and giving it to big corporate acts. And of course where that relates to Agenda 21: the farmers that don’t have water end up drying up. And they have to sell their farms. And there are corporations that come in, for pennies on the dollar, and they take that land. And they push the farmers into the cities. And what it does: it consolidates control not only over the land but also over the water.
23.32 And when it moves past California, which it will, we’re going to be seeing this everywhere. And as a matter of fact, we are.
23.46 Geoengineering creates what is called “abiotic stress”. Abiotic stress is anything that will stress the soil. It’s fungal overgrowth, too much moisture. It’s drought conditions, heavy metal contamination. These programm literally destroy the soils around the world. When the crops, especially organic crops, start to fail, which they are - the farm that I stay on in Maui (Hawaii) we’ve had a fifty percent decline in our ability to get yield. What they do – Monsanto comes in. It has developed a genetically modified abiotic-stress-resistant seed that will grow in this new environment. George, what they’re doing – well, they’re doing a lot – one of the things that they are doing – they’re taking over agriculture and forests through death and destruction.
26.47 In the geoengineering movement there has been a lot of division over this issue of global warming, people arguing over whether it is warming or cooling. Supporting the warming theory does nothing but support the very legislation which is aimed at legalizing geoengineering. So we don’t promote that and we don’t support that. However, it’s impossible, it’s literally impossible - and I’ll ask the audience tonight, please tell me, how – with ongoing geoengineering programs - anyone can tell whether the planet is warming or cooling. And with that, is it prudent to move forward with giving up our power, our control, our national boundaries, even our privacy in our own homes, and a whole lot more?
27.42 People have tested, in Arizona, and actually around the world, had their blood tested, and their hair tested, finding, again, thousands of times the normal amounts of aluminum, barium, strontium and other metals that are related to coal fly ash. So it appears, just like what we had with fluoride being a waste product. Where was it put? It was put into the water. It appears that coal fly ash is a very effective residue from burning coal which is mandated to be captured in precipitators. So it’s not allowed to go up into the smokestack. But it does have very high amounts of aluminum, barium, strontium, lead, all of these things that I was wondering when we initially took the tests. In both “What in the World” and “Why in the World” are we spraying we looked at aluminum, barium and strontium only. But we’re finding things such as arsenic and many other things. And now Dr. Herndon has performed a number of rain tests from certain regions, and he has found the footprint, or the fingerprint, of coal fly ash, which again is a very effective residue to put up in our sky for geoengineering purposes. But it’s devastating for human health.
30.04 I remember back, George, during the Iraq war, and somebody said to me, and I think I was in church and they said: “Wow, can you believe God is on the side of the U.S. government because right before they invaded Iraq, the Iraqi army was destroyed by these tremendous sandstorms and they couldn’t get their flights off the ground”. And I said: “Yeah, God must be on the side of the US.” Now, knowing that this technology has been around for years and it’s very effective for warfare purposes, it’s very clear to me. You know, it leads me to question.”
34.24 There is a five-year period of implementation and once that goes out of the United States’ or other jurisdictions, who do you go to? Well, you go to… what is it, the tribunals that are formed by the TPP, the TTIP? Those are formed by the corporations, and those are legally binding. There are a couple of back doors and loopholes related to this climate change agreement and there’s been a little bit of argument whether it’s binding or non-binding. The reality of it is: it’s partially binding, not in all areas. But the TPP is legally binding, and what it does, it gives the corporations the ability to sue municipalities if they interfere with the corporations’ profitability. Geoengineering programmes are very profitable.
37.05 It’s the problem/reaction solution. Create the climate change. Get a population around the world to support your method under the guise of saving the planet. But they’re the ones who are destroying it. And get support for all these monetary and political changes that are not in the best interests of people. We’re looking at some real Orwellian changes here, with the smart meters.
52.41 Any time you have a model, what you put in and what you get out need to be accurate. I compare this issue in the models. The models being: let’s say you’re in your home, and you turn the heat up to one hundred degrees. Would it be prudent to say; “Oh my God. It’s getting hot outside!”? It might be getting hot outside. It might be getting cold outside. You don’t know until you turn off the heat, the heat being geoengineering. And that’s what we have. We have regional displacements of weather systems, of jet streams and thus temperatures. And that’s why we’re getting the warming in the Arctic, the subzero weather down in the south part of America, in the southern states. You cannot get an accurate temperature reading until the heating or cooling factor is changed and the Earth is able to rebound back to its natural state. And at that time, then you can. But, you know, due to the fact that the very entities who benefit from this are the ones that are geoengineering, and they are aware of this – they’re not, you know, blind. Honest: this is about money, it’s about power, it’s about control, it’s about global domination. It’s about controlling you, in your home. It’s about controlling everything that people do in this world. It’s a new system. It’s a carbon-based system. It is a carbon-based economy. It’s a complete transformation. And if people were even aware of what we are looking at, and I’m talking about…you might…We are all going to have to be capped. Unless you have money and you have the ability to trade carbon credits. All of our energy sources. All of what we do is based on carbon. And, you might only be able to drive ten miles a day. And now, in Oregon, they’re actually monitoring people, and there’s a tax. A mileage tax. And you will be capped. I don’t know how much. But you might only be able to drive seventy miles per week. If you work fifty miles away, what’s that going to mean? And how much are you going to be taxed each mile after? Or how much will you be penalized? You know, these are some really good questions that people demanding that the legislators do more are not asking. What about in your home? Let’s say if you leave a light on. We have smart meters that monitor everything that we do in our home. Let’s say you leave a light on when you go to work. Your smart meter detects that. You could get a few-hundred-dollar fine for leaving that light on. I mean these things are pretty severe. And then, let’s say – these smart meters can measure everything. We interviewed a lot of people in relation to this. They have the ability to determine what appliances we are using. And this again is a whole new green-based economy that is coming in, and green-based appliances, and they will be mandating, against our will. They will be telling us what products to buy, when we can use them, and how we can use them. And let’s say you’re using your vacuum cleaner - in five years – we’re looking at a five-year planned implementation – and it’s not registered green. You could get a fine for that. This is what corporations love, because through these climate agreements, and what these climate agreements are doing, is to really create a dictatorship. So the corporations, working with government to determine what you do, what you buy, when you use everything. They love it, because you will not have a choice. You will be forced into many things. And this is a complete transformation of life, of freedom, the way that we know things. The clamp is coming down. And again, I can’t stress, these are all predicated – everything that we’re seeing –all of these taxes, on climate models that are flawed. They’re fraudulent. We can prove that, and we have to stop it. And if you think these things are bad… I don’t want geoengineering. And I’m certainly not going to accept geoengineering based on climate models that said the planet’s warming when I know , and when the scientists know, that it’s impossible to determine whether it’s warming or cooling.
57.26 We’re not saying the planet’s not warming or not cooling. We’re not even arguing that. And that’s the beauty of it because what it does: it gives incentive for those who are really pushing this climate change agenda and the global warming issue. We can partner with them to say let’s move forward in stopping geoengineering, together collectively for the planet. Let’s partner. And that’s what our message is.
Some really good questions that people demanding that the legislators do more are not asking
We’re not saying the planet’s not warming or not cooling. We’re not even arguing that. And that’s the beauty of it because what it does: it gives incentive for those who are really pushing this climate change agenda and the global warming issue. We can partner with them to say let’s move forward in stopping geoengineering, together collectively for the planet. Let’s partner. And that’s what our message is.
6.00 Many people are noticing now that forests are collapsing. I spent the summer in Chicago and they’ve had an abundance, just an abundance of rain, over the past couple of years, and I would say about twenty percent of the trees are dead. They are dying.
6.29 What we addressed in both of the two previous films: the aluminum, and that’s the primary ingredient, that they’re spraying, and other things as well which hopefully we’ll get into, they are very toxic to soils, to ecosystems and as a result the PH has been changing, sometimes in certain areas up to ten times the alkalinity. As a result of those changes due to the metals that they’re putting into our sky we’re getting these ecosystem collapses. We’re getting forests collapsing, but as we’ve spoken about in other shows there’s a company called Arbigen that’s genetically modifying forests. So the trees die. Corporate America, or should I say the genetically modified companies, are there, to “save the day”.
13.55 What geoengineering is doing, it’s creating climate change. Geoengineering programs are designed to manipulate our weather and they’re designed to change the temperature of our planet. And because of this they’re creating a huge amount of our change in climate and everything of course that we see in terms of drought, in terms of temperature fluctuations, whether it’s the Jetstream or, you know, different storms coming in, it’s being blamed on CO2. And based on what we’ve researched, and from the mouths of geoengineers, these programmes change our climate. And what we have to look at, right now global governance is being formed. We have the largest transfer of monetary and political power in the history of our planet all being determined based on climate models that are targeting CO2 as the source of our changing climate. A lot of people argue. They argue whether the planet is warming or cooling. We don’t do that. Our stance is very strong. It is literally impossible to determine what the planet is doing based on the fact that we have had geoengineering for well over forty years.
15.51 Again, we don’t argue whether the planet is warming or cooling but what we are asking people to do is come together, take a second look at this, recognize that the climate models are flawed. They are missing the biggest factor in the climate change argument, and that is geoengineering. And because of that the climate models are flawed and you cannot move forward with taxation, with removing states’ national boundaries, you cannot circumvent constitutions and state laws, and those are the things that are going on.
18.30 There are certain interests, again, that really want to see the transfer of power. But there are losers, within this. There are people that might lose their companies. There are people that are definitely damaged. And also regions, you know. Certain regions that signed on to the COP21, the recent Paris, France, climate agreement. You know, I think some of them lose. But I think their backs are against the wall, so what we’re looking to do is getting support from both sides.
19.17 Geoengineering is being sold as a way to mitigate global warming. However, global warming was determined after geoengineering programs had started. We found research, you know going back, and data that shows that these programs have been ongoing since the fifties. So when these models, the climate models, were designed, they were designed not including geoengineering programs. And we believe that’s the biggest factor in our changing climate. Most people realize, especially us here in California, that our weather has been changing, that we’re having a massive drought, but you go into the Midwest, they’re getting…
George Noory: We’re flooding. We’re flooding like crazy. My daughter lost her townhouse a month ago from floods.
Exactly. So if you go up to the Arctic – and I’ll explain what’s happening – it’s very warm up there, so yes, people are saying ”Yeah, of course, you know, there is global warming”. But if you’re on the East Coast, it’s very cold. And what they’re doing, George, and what we explained in the first film, through geoengineering they have the ability to put the aerosols, which primarily are heavy metals – looks like it could be coal fly ash, at least in some of the programs, - anyway, they put these metals into the atmosphere and through HAARP and other HAARP-like technologies, ionosphere heaters, they have the ability to heat up areas of the Pacific. So what we’ve been seeing outside of California for the past couple of years: the jet stream, which should be coming right into California, bringing in precipitation and bringing in normal weather patterns, it’s getting diverted, because it hits the bubble. When they heat that up of course it creates a bubble and the jet stream hits it and it diverts north so it brings all that warm weather and all that precipitation into the Arctic region. And it warms it, and it starts melting the ice. But of course any stream, once you block it, like a river, or a stream, it’s going to want to correct itself. And it does. And it brings all that cold weather back into the Midwest and the East Coast. And that’s why California has been getting droughted out. And that’s why the Midwest and the East Coast have had an abundance of rain, very cold summers and very cold weather. That IS the climate change that is going on. Now, my first question when I heard about this, it was “Why would somebody want to do this?” You know. It didn’t make sense to me. Until we looked at California and some of the political objectives, which appear to be – right now – being met. And some of those are related to Agenda 2130. We interviewed Rosa Koire, who has been on your show and she was a tremendous… .
George Noory: Yes, she’s very good.
Yeah, and Patrick Wood did just a wonderful job. What’s happening in California: there’s a water issue. . And because of the drought, which – no question about it – was geoengineering, Jerry Brown called for a state of emergency here in California. And what that state of emergency does, it gives him the ability through eminent domain to take property, to take land. And it also gives him the ability to allocate water from small farmers who have had water trusts, and they have water rights… What’s being done is they’re diverting water away from them and giving it to big corporate acts. And of course where that relates to Agenda 21: the farmers that don’t have water end up drying up. And they have to sell their farms. And there are corporations that come in, for pennies on the dollar, and they take that land. And they push the farmers into the cities. And what it does: it consolidates control not only over the land but also over the water.
23.32 And when it moves past California, which it will, we’re going to be seeing this everywhere. And as a matter of fact, we are.
23.46 Geoengineering creates what is called “abiotic stress”. Abiotic stress is anything that will stress the soil. It’s fungal overgrowth, too much moisture. It’s drought conditions, heavy metal contamination. These programm literally destroy the soils around the world. When the crops, especially organic crops, start to fail, which they are - the farm that I stay on in Maui (Hawaii) we’ve had a fifty percent decline in our ability to get yield. What they do – Monsanto comes in. It has developed a genetically modified abiotic-stress-resistant seed that will grow in this new environment. George, what they’re doing – well, they’re doing a lot – one of the things that they are doing – they’re taking over agriculture and forests through death and destruction.
26.47 In the geoengineering movement there has been a lot of division over this issue of global warming, people arguing over whether it is warming or cooling. Supporting the warming theory does nothing but support the very legislation which is aimed at legalizing geoengineering. So we don’t promote that and we don’t support that. However, it’s impossible, it’s literally impossible - and I’ll ask the audience tonight, please tell me, how – with ongoing geoengineering programs - anyone can tell whether the planet is warming or cooling. And with that, is it prudent to move forward with giving up our power, our control, our national boundaries, even our privacy in our own homes, and a whole lot more?
27.42 People have tested, in Arizona, and actually around the world, had their blood tested, and their hair tested, finding, again, thousands of times the normal amounts of aluminum, barium, strontium and other metals that are related to coal fly ash. So it appears, just like what we had with fluoride being a waste product. Where was it put? It was put into the water. It appears that coal fly ash is a very effective residue from burning coal which is mandated to be captured in precipitators. So it’s not allowed to go up into the smokestack. But it does have very high amounts of aluminum, barium, strontium, lead, all of these things that I was wondering when we initially took the tests. In both “What in the World” and “Why in the World” are we spraying we looked at aluminum, barium and strontium only. But we’re finding things such as arsenic and many other things. And now Dr. Herndon has performed a number of rain tests from certain regions, and he has found the footprint, or the fingerprint, of coal fly ash, which again is a very effective residue to put up in our sky for geoengineering purposes. But it’s devastating for human health.
30.04 I remember back, George, during the Iraq war, and somebody said to me, and I think I was in church and they said: “Wow, can you believe God is on the side of the U.S. government because right before they invaded Iraq, the Iraqi army was destroyed by these tremendous sandstorms and they couldn’t get their flights off the ground”. And I said: “Yeah, God must be on the side of the US.” Now, knowing that this technology has been around for years and it’s very effective for warfare purposes, it’s very clear to me. You know, it leads me to question.”
34.24 There is a five-year period of implementation and once that goes out of the United States’ or other jurisdictions, who do you go to? Well, you go to… what is it, the tribunals that are formed by the TPP, the TTIP? Those are formed by the corporations, and those are legally binding. There are a couple of back doors and loopholes related to this climate change agreement and there’s been a little bit of argument whether it’s binding or non-binding. The reality of it is: it’s partially binding, not in all areas. But the TPP is legally binding, and what it does, it gives the corporations the ability to sue municipalities if they interfere with the corporations’ profitability. Geoengineering programmes are very profitable.
37.05 It’s the problem/reaction solution. Create the climate change. Get a population around the world to support your method under the guise of saving the planet. But they’re the ones who are destroying it. And get support for all these monetary and political changes that are not in the best interests of people. We’re looking at some real Orwellian changes here, with the smart meters.
52.41 Any time you have a model, what you put in and what you get out need to be accurate. I compare this issue in the models. The models being: let’s say you’re in your home, and you turn the heat up to one hundred degrees. Would it be prudent to say; “Oh my God. It’s getting hot outside!”? It might be getting hot outside. It might be getting cold outside. You don’t know until you turn off the heat, the heat being geoengineering. And that’s what we have. We have regional displacements of weather systems, of jet streams and thus temperatures. And that’s why we’re getting the warming in the Arctic, the subzero weather down in the south part of America, in the southern states. You cannot get an accurate temperature reading until the heating or cooling factor is changed and the Earth is able to rebound back to its natural state. And at that time, then you can. But, you know, due to the fact that the very entities who benefit from this are the ones that are geoengineering, and they are aware of this – they’re not, you know, blind. Honest: this is about money, it’s about power, it’s about control, it’s about global domination. It’s about controlling you, in your home. It’s about controlling everything that people do in this world. It’s a new system. It’s a carbon-based system. It is a carbon-based economy. It’s a complete transformation. And if people were even aware of what we are looking at, and I’m talking about…you might…We are all going to have to be capped. Unless you have money and you have the ability to trade carbon credits. All of our energy sources. All of what we do is based on carbon. And, you might only be able to drive ten miles a day. And now, in Oregon, they’re actually monitoring people, and there’s a tax. A mileage tax. And you will be capped. I don’t know how much. But you might only be able to drive seventy miles per week. If you work fifty miles away, what’s that going to mean? And how much are you going to be taxed each mile after? Or how much will you be penalized? You know, these are some really good questions that people demanding that the legislators do more are not asking. What about in your home? Let’s say if you leave a light on. We have smart meters that monitor everything that we do in our home. Let’s say you leave a light on when you go to work. Your smart meter detects that. You could get a few-hundred-dollar fine for leaving that light on. I mean these things are pretty severe. And then, let’s say – these smart meters can measure everything. We interviewed a lot of people in relation to this. They have the ability to determine what appliances we are using. And this again is a whole new green-based economy that is coming in, and green-based appliances, and they will be mandating, against our will. They will be telling us what products to buy, when we can use them, and how we can use them. And let’s say you’re using your vacuum cleaner - in five years – we’re looking at a five-year planned implementation – and it’s not registered green. You could get a fine for that. This is what corporations love, because through these climate agreements, and what these climate agreements are doing, is to really create a dictatorship. So the corporations, working with government to determine what you do, what you buy, when you use everything. They love it, because you will not have a choice. You will be forced into many things. And this is a complete transformation of life, of freedom, the way that we know things. The clamp is coming down. And again, I can’t stress, these are all predicated – everything that we’re seeing –all of these taxes, on climate models that are flawed. They’re fraudulent. We can prove that, and we have to stop it. And if you think these things are bad… I don’t want geoengineering. And I’m certainly not going to accept geoengineering based on climate models that said the planet’s warming when I know , and when the scientists know, that it’s impossible to determine whether it’s warming or cooling.
57.26 We’re not saying the planet’s not warming or not cooling. We’re not even arguing that. And that’s the beauty of it because what it does: it gives incentive for those who are really pushing this climate change agenda and the global warming issue. We can partner with them to say let’s move forward in stopping geoengineering, together collectively for the planet. Let’s partner. And that’s what our message is.